I think a movie about Larten would be great but who could play him? who could fit his personality and looks o create him. I think it would ruin peoples idea of him.
I think a movie about Larten would be great but who could play him? who could fit his personality and looks o create him. I think it would ruin peoples idea of him.
I think Rupert Grint would be pefect for the role as Larten
A Saga of Larten Crepsley movie would be far easier than a Cirque du Freak movie, with fewer books to follow up. It would allow for 4 movies to be made, each taking a great amount of time and care to create a worthy adaption. I think a great director for the job would be David Fincher.
I think it would be good but the character of larten would have to be perfect. but wouldn’t the dates would jump about a bit as through half of it he is a child then he’s an adult in book 1, only people who had read the book would really understand it, for people who have never read a Darren Shan book probably wouldn’t get it. but the other 3 books would as he is mostly the same age.
I think it would be good but the character of larten would have to be perfect. but wouldn’t the dates would jump about a bit as through half of it he is a child then he’s an adult in book 1, only people who had read the book would really understand it, for people who have never read a Darren Shan book probably wouldn’t get it. but the other 3 books would as he is mostly the same age.
I think it would be good but the character of larten would have to be perfect. but wouldn’t the dates would jump about a bit as through half of it he is a child then he’s an adult in book 1, only people who had read the book would really understand it, for people who have never read a Darren Shan book probably wouldn’t get it. but the other 3 books would as he is mostly the same age.
Nothing that can’t be solved with a simple explanation that Vampires age slower than humans. Also getting an actor for Larten as a kid and an adult.
I like the idea but as many of said it would have to follow the books. I liked Cirque Du Freak the movie untill I read the books and it got under my skin with the amount of stuff that was changed. I know you have to change somethings but to invent characters who where never in the books is annoying to me. It is just the fact they changed stuff that was key to the story like Darren would never have given in to feeding on a human like that, taking his family hostage, letting the cat out of the bag for Steve being the Vampaneze Lord that early in the story, It was suppost to cover the first three books yet they is nothing from book three other than Murlough being there. In the film Crepsley takes Darren streight to the camp where was all the unhappy wondering that sets up Darren not being thrilled about being a vampire.And did we really need Crepsley having a girlfriend? That is a few of the reasons who I did not like the film after reading the books there is plenty more.
So If they chose to do a film on Crepsley it would have to be done better than what they did for CDF
I think we would be better off without one. SOLC isn’t a story that can reach new fans, it gets all of its fans from CDF. How many of us can say that we read SOLC before CDF but still enjoyed it in full? I’m sure the VAST majority of us only read it because of CDF. If CDF didn’t have a big enough fan base to justify a big budget/good movie, then how could it’s spin off series be any better? I just can’t see an SOLC movie turning out any good. :/
